<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<post>
  <id type="integer">74</id>
  <title>Careful what you wish for</title>
  <content>
<p>I like to keep things simple.  To that end, on a daily basis I get by with the help of a minimal group of web services, namely, Gmail and Google Reader.  Delicious, however, creeps in every so often as a useful web-based bookmarking service, and to its credit, I rarely bookmark anything locally.</p>

<p>A few weeks ago, I lodged a complaint to my peers: <em>I wish I could &#8220;star&#8221; any ol&#8217; page in Google Reader</em>.  I often mark interesting posts or stuff I want to revisit later and it seems redundant to use Delicious in the same way for anything that isn&#8217;t a feed.  Since Google exposes shared and starred posts as well, the social spread isn&#8217;t necessarily hampered.  Smash them together.</p>

<p>Then I found it:</p>

<p><img src="/files/google_reader_notes.png" /></p>

<p><em>Notes</em> is Google&#8217;s answer to my request.  It lets you bookmark any web page as a <em>Note</em>, which can be tagged, shared or starred..  I believe there used to be a separate service of this sort (Notebook or something?), but it truly finds a nice home inside Reader.  There&#8217;s even a requisite JavaScript bookmarklet for quick entry.</p>

<p>Yet&#8230; I&#8217;m still finding it hard to dump Delicious for a few reasons.  First, Delicious makes sure tagging is front and center, while Google doesn&#8217;t provide an entry field inside the bookmarklet&#8217;s pop-up.  Having to navigate afterwards to the Note inside Reader is an unacceptable barrier to well-organized tags.  Second, Delicious makes sharing and discovery much, much easier.  I can specifically send a bookmark to a fellow user and quickly click around to uncover more interesting sites and links.  Google doesn&#8217;t really have an answer for this.</p>

<p>In a way, this is an example of the classical &#8220;macro vs. micro&#8221; problem.  The all-in-one printer-scanner-copier pitted against three separate machines.  Convenience versus specialization.  Reader&#8217;s about feeds and may never do general purpose bookmarks as well as Delicious.  Maybe it doesn&#8217;t need to.</p>

<p>Nonetheless, I&#8217;m left with some questions that reveal how deeply I crave tidiness and a well-defined tao for all things.  To a fault perhaps.  <em>Do I cleave and share posts in Reader, pages in Delicious?</em>  <em>Should I write something that syncs them?</em>  <em>Should I re-bookmark everything as Notes and have done with it?</em></p>

<p>Or fuck it.  <a href="http://friendfeed.com/daveyeu">Friendfeed</a> manages to capture it all anyway.</p>  </content>
  <published-on type="datetime">2008-09-09T04:14:58Z</published-on>
  <created-on type="datetime">2008-09-09T04:14:58Z</created-on>
  <updated-on type="datetime">2008-09-09T04:14:58Z</updated-on>
</post>
