<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<posts>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">8</id>
    <title>Instrument Odyssey</title>
    <content>
<p>Sitting with a friend the other day, discussing music, a question arose: <em>what does the future hold for musical instruments</em>?</p>

<p>Naturally, we started with an aside, trying to nail down the major categories of sound making &#8211; woodwind, percussion, brass, and vibration.  But doesn&#8217;t <em>vibration</em> encompass all of those?  Surely, since it is the basis of sound itself.  Unable to derive an instrumental taxonomy, we moved on.</p>

<p>Well, <em>recent advances</em>?  In our lifetimes (admittedly short thus far), what have we seen?  For one, the dominant rise of the computer as a musical tool.  Instruments began playing with electric fire long ago, but the recent digitization of music has brought on the city-engulfing blaze.  Witness electronica.</p>

<p>Let us not forget, however, that there have <a href="http://www.starrlabs.com/z6.html">been some mistakes</a> down this road.</p>

<p>I would also purport to say that the <em>turntable</em> rightly deserves to be mentioned as another recent inductee, having ushered in hip-hop, rap, electronica, and the glory of glitch.  Interestingly, it also serves to contrast computer-induced digitization by being overtly analog.  To the point, I&#8217;ve also heard that CD and/or iPod based turntables have not been welcomed by the DJ community, and although this is most likely due to the importance of the uniqueness of one&#8217;s stack of vinyl, I imagine that love for the analog hiss may have a small part to play as well.</p>

<p>And the future?  The prospect of beautiful, interactive electronic instruments seems just on the horizon, as evidenced by  <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4689008057039304357&amp;hl=en">this demonstration</a>.  Check out the additional videos on the sidebar and take note of the <em>line-in</em> widget.  In addition to pure electronica, I can imagine live bands being remixed and conducted by a <em>director</em> of sorts, who joins them on stage, driving far more interaction than today&#8217;s engineer at the soundboard.  And <em>digital luthier</em> has a great ring to it.</p>

<p>Who really knows what else.  I wait to be pleasantly surprised by the mad audio scientist craftsmen the world over.</p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-31T02:16:33Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-31T02:12:22Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-31T02:16:33Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">7</id>
    <title>Neat Music Guide</title>
    <content>
<p><a href="http://www.di.fm/edmguide/edmguide.html">A cool Flash electronic music guide.</a></p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-28T23:11:45Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-28T23:11:38Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-28T23:11:45Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">6</id>
    <title>Of Readers and Feeds</title>
    <content>
<p><em>In the beginning</em>&#8230; I wasn&#8217;t a fan of feed readers at all.  I enjoyed
visiting each site, taking in the uniqueness, the design, the atmosphere
that made each one familiar.</p>

<p>Alas, the reading list grew, convenience crept in, and so began the Journey
of Aggregation.  These days, I hardly visit sites from which I feed, and
pangs of annoyance arise when the full post isn&#8217;t syndicated.</p>

<p>I think My First Reader&trade; was <a href="http://www.rssowl.org">RSSOwl</a>, Java-based and pretty, but
ultimately doomed by browser-related bugs in Linux (admittedly, a problem
with SWT at the time, and I&#8217;m sure quite squashed by now).  Next was
<a href="http://liferea.sourceforge.net">Liferea</a>, a GTK reader which I used for a long stretch.  I eventually
ditched it in favor of web-based readers when I got tired of the lack of
synchronization between work and home.</p>

<p>Actually, to backtrack a little and provide a bit of foreshadowing as well
(<em>oooh!</em>), I did try Google Reader in between the two desktop apps.  At the
time, however, it sucked &#8211; slow, terrible interface, and a misguided attempt
to create a <em>melting pot</em> of posts.  I moved on.</p>

<p>Post-Liferea, I migrated to <a href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a>, and was quite happy with it.  I
didn&#8217;t need to worry about re-marking read posts anymore, and the site was
pretty snappy.  I was sold on web-based readers.</p>

<p>As it has a tendency to do, however, Google recently played a trump &#8211; an
updated <a href="http://google.com/reader">Reader</a> without equal.  Kudos for seeing the flaws in the
original application and completely overhauling the whole damn thing.  Its
similarity to Gmail has made it effortless to use and I&#8217;m hooked to the
trends page, which I hope they expand (I&#8217;m a sucker for metrics).
Altogether, simply the best tool yet for feeds.</p>

<h3>Reading List</h3>

<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m currently imbibing.  Or, the <a href="http://blogforsamurai.com/files/google-reader-subscriptions.xml">OPML version</a>, if you prefer.</p>

<p>Dev:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/">A List Apart</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/">Coding Horror</a></li>
<li><a href="http://errtheblog.com/">Err the Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/">Joel on Software</a></li>
<li><a href="http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/">Musings</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts">Signal vs. Noise</a></li>
<li><a href="http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/index.html">Stevey&#8217;s Blog Rants</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thinkvitamin.com/">Vitamin</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Tech:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/index.ars">Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a></li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals.ars">Journals.ars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/index.html">Official Google Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slashdot.org/">Slashdot</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Zeit:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogforsamurai.com/">blogforsamurai.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/">FREEwilliamsburg</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gawker.com/">Gawker</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/">Penny-Arcade</a></li>
<li><a href="http://reddit.com/">reddit.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.subtraction.com/">Subtraction</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/">the show with zefrank</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/">WFMU&#8217;s Beware of the Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.xkcd.com/">xkcd.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/">ze&#8217;s page :: zefrank.com</a></li>
</ul>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-24T18:06:49Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-24T18:04:14Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-24T18:06:49Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">5</id>
    <title>Bit of a Redesign</title>
    <content>
<p>Just a few changes&#8230;</p>

<ul>
<li>I liked the larger font size, such a <em>two-point-oh</em> hallmark, but it was
rendering worse than the current, smaller size.  At least, for me.</li>
<li>After switching back and forth between Georgia and Arial, I decided to
stick with Georgia.  I like its print feel, even if sans-serif fonts
dominate rightfully because of their readability.</li>
<li>The icons are gone.  First, they used PNG transparency, and were useless 
for IE 6.  And second, making them was slowing me down &#8211; slinging GIMP
and Inkscape using a touchpad may actually be the definition of <em>impede</em>.</li>
<li>Rounded corners no more.</li>
</ul>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-18T17:42:19Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-18T17:41:42Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-19T00:39:28Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">4</id>
    <title>The Hours</title>
    <content>
<p>I am susceptible to the coding threat known as <em>the deep hesitation</em>.  Every
once in a while, I find myself staring at the editor, hypnotized by a design
problem or possible refactor.  It&#8217;s a paralyzing belief that a higher, better
way exists, elusive and beyond reach.</p>

<p>Oftentimes, these code dreams begin to multiply, and the <em>One becomes Many</em>.
Each of these hellspawn reveals itself coyly as glimpses before the next
one comes swooping in for attention.  And the swap goes on&#8230;</p>

<p>Needless to say, wasting time in this manner is frustrating.</p>

<p><em>Try not.  Do.</em></p>

<p>The best answer I have to this problem comes from the Church of Test-Driven
Development; namely, <em>&#8220;Do the simplest thing that works&#8221;</em>.  Forget about
optimization or elegance and simply solve the problem.  I find that if I just
start writing, perhaps a hare-brained idea or an ugly hack, the juices that
start flowing as a result often spur me towards a better solution.</p>

<p>Besides, coding as an iterative solution makes sense.  <em>Writing</em> and
<em>refactoring</em> are universal traits of nearly all creative activities.  Sure,
every once in a while a ray of light may illuminate your way.  But
on the rainy days, just do the hard work.</p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-13T01:17:11Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-13T01:14:29Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-13T01:17:11Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">3</id>
    <title>Sink or Swim</title>
    <content>
<p>A good friend recently decided on a sea change &#8211; he&#8217;s taken an <em>unpaid internship</em>.  For an indeterminate amount of future, he will be slaving for free.  In New York City.</p>

<p>He has a job, but it&#8217;s not a career.  Like most twenty-six year old college graduates, he&#8217;s become a capable employee.  I&#8217;d go so far as to say <em>valuable</em> in this case.  But that surely isn&#8217;t enough.  What pride wells up from a lukewarm profession is swiftly melted when confronted by real passion.  He walks through spreadsheets, spins useless cycles on government drudgery, and then comes home to <em>real work</em>.</p>

<p>And so he&#8217;s found an exit out and an entrance in, and the fee, unfortunately, is steep.  Sure, the prospect of Ramen-all-the-time is grim.  So is the likely cutback on the city&#8217;s recreational offerings.  Legitimate concerns.</p>

<p>We should all be so brave.</p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-08T00:03:06Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-08T00:00:28Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-11T14:07:52Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">2</id>
    <title>The End of "the show"</title>
    <content>
<p><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/">the show with ze frank</a>, comes to a close this month.  For the uninitiated, get thither, and bask under the weight of a year&#8217;s worth.  Start with your birthday.  Maybe pick a few holidays.</p>

<p>And of course, <em>thanks Ze</em>.</p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-05T22:29:36Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-05T22:22:54Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-11T14:08:03Z</updated-on>
  </post>
  <post>
    <id type="integer">1</id>
    <title>Revived</title>
    <content>
<p>After quite the hiatus, the foodforsamurai.com blog is back, redubbed <em>blogforsamurai.com</em>.  Hooray.</p>

<p>Stark and sleek, retaining the laid-back posting environment of the original.  As well, there is no predetermined theme here, just stuff as I see fit.</p>

<p>The site also rebounds with a new engine, custom-developed with an amazing <em>lack of features</em>.  Comments?  <em>Sorry, no.</em>  IE6 on Windows?  <em>Ugly.</em>  But expect changes over time.</p>

<p>Feels good to be back.</p>    </content>
    <published-on type="datetime">2007-03-01T00:56:14Z</published-on>
    <created-on type="datetime">2007-03-01T00:56:14Z</created-on>
    <updated-on type="datetime">2007-03-11T14:08:13Z</updated-on>
  </post>
</posts>
